When we consider the topic of mass tourism in Mount Everest, the first thing that comes to mind is economic development and tourist attraction. This essay will look into the advantages and disadvantages of mass tourism in this well-known Mount.
Many argue that mass tourism in Mount Everest is by far the best option as it allows to Government make the area prosper and there is no denying that mass tourism is also a reasonable course of action for those who wish to promote tourism. Yet, there are factors like avalanches and pollution that should also be taken into account in order to make the best choice. There is much more to life than just economic development and tourist attraction. According to the latest research, 75% of China and Nepal citizens value avoid avalanches over economic development. Moreover, not having a mass tourism in that Mount has two additional major advantages, namely not causing environmental damage and the fact that the area would have more healthiness. If the environment ranks high on your priority list, then mass tourism in Mount Everest should definitely be out of the question. And last, but certainly not least, you must consider whether healthiness is an issue for you. If so, then not having a mass tourism is likely to be a much better option for you. To sum up, although on the face of it having a mass tourism in this Mount, sounds like a good idea when it comes to developing economically the region, a more in-depth analysis suggests otherwise. In fact, most evidence points to the fact that if avoiding avalanches, not causing pollution, not damaging the environment and healthiness is what you are after, then not having a mass tourism in Mount Everest will probably work best for you.
1 Comentario
|
AutorEscriba algo sobre usted. No tiene que ser nada exhaustivo, solo un resumen. Archivos
Enero 2017
Categorías |